Notability For Vehicles

What is the notability guideline for vehicles on Wikipedia?

The notability guideline for vehicles on Wikipedia policy provides criteria for consistent decisions in articles for deletion and merging discussions, focusing on various types of machines and devices that transport a payload, including but not limited to human beings. The policy covers broad groups, types, subtypes, individual vehicles, and unique vehicles. Notability is determined by significant coverage in secondary sources, adherence to Wikipedia’s core policies, and the vehicle’s distinctiveness in reliable sources.

What types of sources are considered valid for establishing notability for vehicles?

Valid sources for establishing notability for vehicles include reliable secondary sources, such as industry publications, encyclopedic works, authoritative websites, and academic studies. Primary sources, such as identifiers assigned by the manufacturer, may be helpful but should be verified against other reliable sources. Personal websites, blogs, bulletin boards, Usenet posts, wikis, and other media that are not themselves reliable are not considered valid sources for establishing notability.

Can vehicles that don’t meet the general notability guideline still be included in Wikipedia?

A vehicle that does not meet the general notability guideline may still be included in Wikipedia under certain conditions. For example, if the vehicle is part of a larger notable topic or if it has a significant connection to another notable subject, it may be included as a section within a related article. However, it is essential to ensure that the content adheres to Wikipedia’s core policies and does not serve as a vehicle for advertisement or promotion.

Are there specific notability guidelines for different categories of vehicles?

Yes, there are specific notability guidelines for different categories of vehicles, such as broad groups, types, subtypes, individual vehicles, and unique vehicles. Each category has its own set of criteria to determine notability, which may include factors like commercial availability, distinct designations, legal recognition, or significant coverage in reliable sources. These guidelines help ensure that the content related to vehicles on Wikipedia is consistent, relevant, and adheres to the platform’s core policies.

What are the specific notability criteria for subtypes of vehicles on Wikipedia?

The specific notability criteria for subtypes of vehicles on Wikipedia include factors like receiving a distinct model number from the builder or manufacturer, being reported as a distinct subtype in reliable secondary sources, or having a clear distinction from the immediate parent type. Subtypes may be considered notable if their parent article requires splitting and they meet any of these criteria. However, creating separate articles for each subtype is generally discouraged to avoid fragmentation and lowering the level of notability.

What are some common challenges in establishing notability for vehicle subtypes?

Common challenges in establishing notability for vehicle subtypes include finding reliable secondary sources that treat the subtype as distinct, determining whether the subtype warrants a separate article or should be covered under the main article for the parent type, and avoiding fragmentation of articles. Additionally, it is essential to ensure that the content adheres to Wikipedia’s core policies and does not serve as a vehicle for advertisement or promotion.

How can WhiteHatWiki help?

We are an agency that specializes in “white hat” consulting in “conflict of interest” (COI) situations. Proposing a new page, or updates to an existing page about you, your company, family, friends, clients, employers, your financial interests and other external relationships constitutes a COI. Public disclosure of the COI is mandatory; and direct publishing or editing of pages is not allowed. WHW can work with qualified clients to create a draft or proposal that will abide by Wikipedia’s labyrinth of policies to the satisfaction of Wikipedia’s tough, independent reviewers. Contact Us.