Notability For Media Outlets

What is the notability guideline for media outlets on Wikipedia?

The notability guideline for media outlets on Wikipedia requires that the subject has been covered in secondary sources that are reliable, independent, and substantial. This includes newspapers, magazines, radio, and television outlets. The depth of coverage by the source must be considered, and if it is not substantial, multiple independent sources should be cited to establish notability. Trivial or incidental coverage is not sufficient to establish notability.

What types of sources are considered valid for establishing notability for media outlets?

Valid sources for establishing notability for media outlets include reliable published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, television documentaries, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations. However, press releases, autobiographies, advertising, and other self-published material or works where the outlet talks about itself are not considered valid sources for establishing notability.

Can media outlets that don’t meet the general notability guideline still be included in Wikipedia?

Media outlets that do not meet the general notability guideline may still be included in Wikipedia if they are part of a related article, such as their parent company or organization, or in lists based on location, service, or format. However, the information included must be properly verifiable and should not be the primary focus of the article.

Are there specific notability guidelines for different categories of media outlets?

Yes, there are specific notability guidelines for different categories of media outlets, such as newspapers, magazines, journals, broadcast radio and television stations, pay television and radio services, student media, and programming. Each category has its own set of criteria that must be met to establish notability, and these criteria may vary depending on the type of media outlet in question.

What are the specific notability criteria for newspapers, magazines, and journals on Wikipedia?

Newspapers, magazines, and journals are presumed notable on Wikipedia if they meet one or more of the following criteria through reliable sources: they have produced work that has received a well-known and significant journalism award or honor, have served a historic purpose or have a significant history, are considered authoritative or influential in their subject area, are frequently cited by other reliable sources, or are significant publications in ethnic and other non-trivial niche markets.

What are the specific notability criteria for broadcast radio and television stations on Wikipedia?

Broadcast radio and television stations must meet the general notability guideline and are likely to do so if they verifiably meet one or more factors, such as importance to and history in the station’s market or originating some of its own programming. A brief explanation of the broadcast market may be needed for editors to make informed decisions. However, translator or relay stations, proposed stations that never broadcast, and subchannels of individual digital television stations are generally considered non-notable.

What are the specific notability criteria for pay television and radio services on Wikipedia?

Most national and regional pay television and radio services are considered notable, as they are likely to meet the general notability guideline. However, individual channels on a cable or satellite radio service are generally not notable unless they meet the general notability guideline.

What are the specific notability criteria for student media on Wikipedia?

Student media, such as college radio stations and student newspapers, are judged by the same inclusion standards as any other media outlet. They are not presumed non-notable just because they primarily serve a university or college student population. A student newspaper or radio station that is deemed non-notable should be redirected to the college or university that it serves.

What are the specific notability criteria for podcasts on Wikipedia?

An individual podcast is likely to be notable if it has been produced or distributed by a notable broadcaster or media company. However, the presence or absence of reliable sources is more definitive than the podcast’s affiliation with any particular entity. Podcasts are also more likely to be notable if they have won a well-known and independent award from either a publication or organization, or have been nominated for such an award in multiple years. Additionally, a podcast is more likely to be notable if it has reached a high position on a notable podcasting chart that updates at least weekly.

What are the specific notability criteria for programming on Wikipedia?

An individual radio program is likely to be notable if it airs on a network of radio stations (either national or regional in scope). It is far less likely to be notable if it airs in only one local media market. In either case, however, the presence or absence of reliable sources is more definitive than the geographic range of the program’s audience alone. For instance, a purely local talk radio program might be notable enough for inclusion if it played a solidly sourceable role in exposing a major political scandal. Television or radio station articles should not contain a comprehensive listing of the station’s entire broadcast schedule but can describe programs the station originates, as long as such information is properly sourced and in-depth, and briefly mention syndicated programs it airs.

What are the specific notability criteria for media lists and categories on Wikipedia?

Lists of a particular type of media outlet should exist only at the country or first-order divisional level. Individual cities or extended media markets are permitted “Media in (City)” lists, which have subsections for radio, television, and print media in that particular city, but should not have separate lists for each individual type of media. Categories can be created based on geographical division, genre, network, or ownership group, but should not combine geographical and non-geographical subcategories.

How can WhiteHatWiki help?

We are an agency that specializes in “white hat” consulting in “conflict of interest” (COI) situations. Proposing a new page, or updates to an existing page about you, your company, family, friends, clients, employers, your financial interests and other external relationships constitutes a COI. Public disclosure of the COI is mandatory; and direct publishing or editing of pages is not allowed. WHW can work with qualified clients to create a draft or proposal that will abide by Wikipedia’s labyrinth of policies to the satisfaction of Wikipedia’s tough, independent reviewers. Contact Us.