CORPORATE WIKIPEDIA EXPERTS
Strategy and Problem Solving
With a wide range of the Fortune 500, big media, high-profile individuals, post-funded start ups, investment firms and communications professionals as clients, WhiteHatWiki is the leading “white hat” ethical provider for Wikipedia strategy and problem solving, including crisis management.
Wikipedia Done Right
Strictly White Hat
WhiteHatWiki specializes in “white hat” ethical Wikipedia strategy and problem solving, offering the highest possible level of writing and research, while strictly abiding by official Wikipedia policies, including full disclosure that we are paid consultants and independent review of all our work.
We not only avoid all “black hat” tactics banned by Wikipedia, we go above and beyond by using the real names and credentials of our experts on Wikipedia. Our full disclosure policy means that unlike most other Wikipedia consultants, we always publicly put our reputation on the line.
Beware of consultants who do not fully public disclose that they are a paid Wikipedia consultant on the “Talk” page of articles and on their personal Wikipedia profiles – it makes their job much easier, but puts you and the article at significant risk of deletion or reversal of changes. It may also violate FCC regulations in the United States and the laws of other countries.
Highly Experienced Wikipedia Consultants
We’ve helped corporations, brands, executives, post-funded start ups, and executives, with articles and updates on a wide range of topics, including on technical subjects ranging from artificial intelligence to cyber attacks. We often help companies quickly resolve issues with unfair or inaccurate content added to articles.
An extensive consultation with the client is followed by intensive background research by world-class Wikipedia experts with impressive real-world backgrounds as academics, lawyers, journalists and executives. Encyclopedia-quality articles and/or re-drafts or updates are produced in strict accordance with Wikipedia policies, such as neutral point of view and reliable sourcing, with the opportunity for several rounds of revisions.
All articles and updates are submitted for independent review by unaffiliated Wikipedia editors. This protects your reputation against from accusations of undisclosed conflict of interest editing. We follow the article through the review and approval process.
Wikipedia Agency Services
The Right Tools to Thrive in a
Wikipedia is a byzantine labyrinth of policies, best practices and politics. Our expert Wikipedia strategy is derived from more than a decade of experience as Wikipedia consultants and many thousands of edits. We’ll help you navigate this complex landscape while staying strictly within Wikipedia’s rules.
After assessing “notability” and consulting with you, our experts conduct intensive research, then create a new page draft that strictly abides by Wikipedia’s complex policies. The draft must be reviewed by independent editors on Wikipedia. We’ll work with you until it’s approved.
Learn More →
Updating a Wikipedia page under the official “conflict of interest” policies is among the most challenging tasks on the encyclopedia. Our success is based on intensive research, deep policy expertise and more than a decade of experience as Wikipedia consultants.
Special policies apply when libelous, highly biased or gross factual inaccuracies lead to conflicts. We often can get a quick resolution in a Wikipedia crisis. We also can help you address warning flags.
Learn More →
Anyone can edit any Wikipedia page at any time, including trolls, which is why monitoring pages is important. We’ll set up 24×7 automated alerts to monitor Wikipedia pages for any changes. We’ll work with you to contest edits that violate Wikipedia policy.
Learn More →
Getting quality press coverage to establish “notability” and verify facts is challenging. We can help. Our experienced team of former top journalists is highly skilled in both PR and Wikipedia. We consult with PR agencies or can serve as your reps.
Learn More →
We want our clients to Wikipedia savvy enough to follow the logic of our recommendations and understand the process of getting requests approved. Unlike practitioners who don’t work collaboratively, we consider it a success when our clients can eventually take over posting straightforward requests without our help