What is the notability guideline for astronomical objects and events on Wikipedia?
The notability guideline for astronomical objects on Wikipedia requires that the event has received significant coverage in reliable sources, such as scientific literature or popular media. The coverage must be specific and substantial, with the event being the primary focus of the study or discussion. Simply being listed in a database or catalog does not guarantee notability.
What types of sources are considered valid for establishing notability for astronomical events?
Valid sources for establishing notability for astronomical objects and events include peer-reviewed scientific journals, books, newspaper articles, and television documentaries that provide significant commentary on the event. A single paper or mention in a list of similar events is not enough to establish notability. The sources must be independent of the discoverer(s) or those who may have a conflict of interest in promoting the event.
Can astronomical objects and events that don’t meet the general notability guideline still be included in Wikipedia?
Yes, astronomical objects and events that do not meet the general notability guideline can still be included in Wikipedia, but they may be incorporated into a broader article or a list of similar events, rather than having a stand-alone article. The content included in a broader article is governed by the principles of due weight and the general content policies.
Are there specific notability guidelines for different categories of astronomical events?
While there are no specific notability guidelines for different categories of astronomical events, some events may be more likely to meet the general notability guideline due to their unique characteristics or significance. For example, events that are visible to the naked eye, listed in historically important catalogs, or have been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works are more likely to be considered notable.
What are the specific notability criteria for solar eclipses as a subtopic of astronomical events on Wikipedia?
For solar eclipses, the specific notability criteria include receiving significant coverage in reliable sources, such as scientific literature, popular media, or historical accounts. The coverage should be specific to the solar eclipse in question and provide substantial commentary or analysis. As with other astronomical events, simply being listed in a catalog or database does not guarantee notability.
What are some common challenges in establishing notability for solar eclipses?
Common challenges in establishing notability for solar eclipses include finding independent sources that provide significant commentary on the event, as many sources may only provide basic information or mention the eclipse in passing. Additionally, solar eclipses that are not visible to the naked eye or have not been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works may have difficulty meeting the general notability guideline.
